better watch this part 2 of transformer really awesome and cool movie like terminator salvation!!!!!!!
www.nextzhelkinz.blogspot.com
Sunday, June 7, 2009
Search goes on after bodies from Air France jet found
Crew keep watch from a Brazilian Air Force Hercules C-130. Brazilian search aircraft spotted seats and part of a plane wing in the Atlantic where an Air France jet went down nearly a week ago, officials said after two bodies and other items were recovered from the area
FERNANDO DE NORONHA, Brazil (AFP) - – Ships and planes scoured the Atlantic Ocean after the first two bodies and debris were recovered from an area off the coast of Brazil where an Air France passenger jet went down nearly a week ago.
"As well as the bodies there are various remains of the aircraft," Brazilian Air Force spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Henry Munhoz told reporters in the northeastern city of Recife.
"Plane seats, part of the wing and various other items were localized," he said.
The finds -- the first from the crash -- were being brought to the Fernando de Noronha archipelago, the closest inhabited spot to the zone where they were found, for initial inspection by five Brazilian forensic police.
From there, they were to be flown to the mainland city of Recife for further analysis by French officials leading the investigation into what sent Air France flight 447 plunging into the ocean June 1 with 228 people on board.
The two male bodies the Brazilian navy recovered in the zone earlier Saturday would be catalogued here and also flown to Recife, Munhoz said.
"Recife will be the final destination for the bodies as well as the debris from the aircraft," he said, adding that "details of the (personal) items collected will be divulged to the relatives and only to the relatives."
The spokesman added that "the state of the bodies will not be divulged."
Relatives of those aboard the Air France flight have already given DNA samples to help identify their loved ones.
Although the black boxes containing vital data on the flight's final minutes have not yet been located, early suspicions are focusing on a possible malfunction of the Airbus A330's air speed sensors as it flew into a fierce storm.
French investigators said Saturday the plane, four hours into a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, suffered multiple systems failures in its final moments and that speed monitors had failed on other Airbus planes.
Airbus on Friday issued a notice urging all pilots of its jets to review a 2001 warning on the procedures to follow if speed indicators give conflicting readings and force the autopilot to cut out.
Meanwhile Air France said it was stepping up replacement of speed monitors on its Airbus A330s, amid speculation that a faulty indication might have been a factor in the loss of the Rio de Janeiro-Paris flight.
In a statement, Air France said that in May last year it began noticing "incidents of loss of airspeed information during cruise flight" on its twin-engine A330s and four-engine A340s, and informed Airbus of the problem.
The device in question is the pitot probe -- usually affixed to the leading edge of a wing -- which measures the force of the air through which an aircraft passes.
Combined with a pressure reading from a static port on the fuselage, it tells the flight crew how fast the aircraft is going through the air.
French submarines were on their way to help with the hunt for the black boxes, as experts scrutinized the debris found so far searching for clues.
On Saturday Brazilian Colonel Jorge Amaral told reporters in Recife that the air force was able to "confirm the recovery from the water of debris and bodies from the Air France plane."
A blue plane seat, a nylon backpack containing a computer and vaccination card, and a leather briefcase with an Air France ticket inside were the first objects plucked from the sea, according to Amaral and an official statement.
The discoveries took place 450 kilometers (300 miles) northeast of the Fernando de Noronha islands, themselves 370 kilometers from the mainland.
The precise spot was 70 kilometers northeast of the point of last communication with the plane, a series of automatically sent messages signaling multiple shutdowns of onboard systems.
Air France was trying to confirm that the recovered seat came from the flight by checking the serial number, which Amaral gave as 23701103B331-0.
French investigators said the Air France airliner sent 24 automatic error messages just before the crash, and its autopilot was disengaged immediately after ones showing conflicting speed readings given by sensors
Ohioan becomes 1st black female rabbi in US
Ohioan becomes 1st black female rabbi in US
06/07/2009 | 04:48 PM
Email this | Email the Editor | Print | ShareThis
CINCINNATI – Describing herself as the "new face of Judaism," Alysa Stanton became the first black female rabbi in the United States during an ordination in Cincinnati.
Stanton, of Blue Ash, was among 14 rabbis ordained Saturday at the Plum Street Temple. She will serve as rabbi of the predominantly white Congregation Bayt Shalom in Greenville, North Carolina, beginning this summer.
The Cincinnati Enquirer reported on its Web site that Stanton said her goals are to break down barriers, build bridges and provide hope.
A native of Cleveland, she studied at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, the oldest institution of higher Jewish education of Reform Judaism in the United States. - AP
06/07/2009 | 04:48 PM
Email this | Email the Editor | Print | ShareThis
CINCINNATI – Describing herself as the "new face of Judaism," Alysa Stanton became the first black female rabbi in the United States during an ordination in Cincinnati.
Stanton, of Blue Ash, was among 14 rabbis ordained Saturday at the Plum Street Temple. She will serve as rabbi of the predominantly white Congregation Bayt Shalom in Greenville, North Carolina, beginning this summer.
The Cincinnati Enquirer reported on its Web site that Stanton said her goals are to break down barriers, build bridges and provide hope.
A native of Cleveland, she studied at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, the oldest institution of higher Jewish education of Reform Judaism in the United States. - AP
Mancao to identify 'Bigote'
MANILA, Philippines – Former police senior superintendent Cezar Mancao II is back in the country, vowing to identify the principal players in the kidnapping and murder of publicist Salvador “Bubby” Dacer and driver Emmanuel Corbito nine years ago.
Mancao told Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez yesterday that he would “stick to what he said in his affidavit,” and would identify “71” and “Bigote” who he said were behind the kidnapping and murder of Dacer and Corbito in November 2000.
Gonzalez said Mancao did not elaborate, but vowed to reveal all that he knows about the murders if he turns state witness.
“I did not want to discuss that affidavit with him because I do not want people to think that he is being dictated upon. It might be counterproductive. He is an intelligent person,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez visited Mancao at the National Bureau of Investigation in Manila hours after his arrival from the US accompanied by NBI officials led by Ricardo Diaz, who took custody of Mancao from US marshals in Los Angeles.
“We just talked about his experience in the US, his regrets, his hopes, and his desire to tell the truth,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez said Mancao felt bitter about being abandoned by the people he had respected.
While in detention in the US, Mancao executed an affidavit linking his former police boss, Sen. Panfilo Lacson, to the murders.
Mancao had served under Lacson, who then headed the defunct Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task Force (PAOCTF).
Lacson, who was allegedly identified as “71” by Mancao in his affidavit, has repeatedly denied any involvement.
Lacson is a graduate of Philippine Military Academy (PMA) Class of 1971 and became chief of the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the PAOCTF, the elite police unit said to be responsible for the killing of Dacer.
Dacer’s clients included ousted President Joseph Estrada, who has also denied any hand in the publicist’s murder.
Mancao’s affidavit supposedly mentioned “Bigote,” describing someone with a mustache who is the alleged mastermind of the murders.
Gonzalez said Mancao is taken under protective custody by the NBI as a possible witness.
He said Mancao is a “prospective state witness” since he will still have to face a preliminary investigation to determine if he could qualify as such. He added Lacson might be subpoenaed depending on the investigation.
Lacson had maintained he has nothing to do with the murders and said there is nothing in Mancao’s affidavit linking him to the crime.
‘Big names’
Malacañang said Mancao’s revelations “might implicate big names in politics.”
Deputy presidential spokesman Anthony Golez said Mancao’s statements are a matter for the public to consider.
“Mancao in his interview said he might implicate big names in politics who are in a position to make decisions that would affect the lives of ordinary Filipinos,” Golez said. “So this should be enough grounds for the public to keep track of the case.”
Golez said the Dacer-Corbito murders are also a test of the country’s judicial system, considering the case has dragged on for years.
On the flight home, Mancao was interviewed by reporters and was asked why he decided to turn state witness.
Mancao said he felt neglected by Lacson, whom he said he had respected all throughout his career in the police service.
Before he was arrested in the US for extradition last year, Mancao said he sought help from his former boss.
“Bago ako nahuli, humingi din naman ako ng tulong. Wala naman akong maasahan na (Before I was arrested I asked for help. But I realized I could not count on getting any help),” he said.
Mancao said it was a “gamble” for him to turn state witness against Lacson.
He said he followed the instructions of Lacson to “lie low” in the US following the ouster of President Estrada in January 2001.
“I gambled here. Maybe this time I will be able to reveal the truth. I sacrificed my career. I left my family. I followed the orders of the person I respected,” Mancao said, referring to Lacson.
Diaz, who accompanied Mancao on the flight home from the US, said he also asked the same question of the former police official.
He said Mancao is preoccupied with his safety in coming home, fearing that some people in the government would silence him.
According to Diaz, Mancao was ecstatic when they flew out of Los Angeles.
“He was enjoying his new-found freedom. And that he was conversing with stewardesses and other flight crew, as well as with the NBI agents. Mancao was also having his picture taken with the stewardesses,” Diaz said.
But the mood changed when Mancao realized they were only minutes away from landing in Manila.
Diaz, however, assured Mancao that he would be safe under the NBI.
Diaz explained to the former police officer the elaborate security arrangements awaiting him in Manila. This made Mancao feel more comfortable, he said.
The security on Mancao’s arrival was elaborate.
More than 200 NBI security personnel had been deployed along the route from the airport while another group, including policemen and military intelligence operatives, surrounded the NBI main office in Manila awaiting the arrival of Mancao.
During the trip from NAIA to the NBI, there were two decoy convoys. Mancao boarded a vehicle that entered through the NBI back gate, avoiding the media waiting for him at the front gate.
Mancao was formally turned over by US marshals to the NBI at the Los Angeles International Airport on June 2, 2009. He was handcuffed when he was turned over to the NBI team.
Shortly afterwards, Diaz removed the handcuffs and accompanied Mancao to board the flight home.
‘To gain my freedom’
Mancao said he decided to end his suffering in the US after eight years of evading prosecution for the murders.
Mancao said he thought of finally revealing the truth. “Maybe with that I can gain my freedom and I can be with my family,” he said.
Mancao later told Secretary Gonzalez that it had been difficult for him to “survive,” recalling his colleague, former senior superintendent Glenn Dumlao, working as a laborer in road projects in the US for financial support.
Aside from Mancao, Dumlao and 20 others were among those charged in the double murder. Another suspect is former police senior superintendent Michael Ray Aquino, who is in the US fighting the Philippine extradition request.
US court papers said Dumlao had confessed his participation in the murders to investigators in the Philippines in 2001. He was scheduled to appear as a star witness at the trial but instead fled to the US.
He was arrested last year near New York where he was working as a handyman, and like Mancao was not contesting his extradition to the Philippines.
Dumlao reportedly also wanted to return home to become state witness.
Gonzalez slammed allegations from Lacson that Mancao’s return to become state witness is “political persecution, not prosecution.”
“We did not manufacture these stories. We never solicited Mancao and Dumlao. They volunteered their testimonies to the government and we just want to know the truth so we are helping them,” he said.
During the meeting with Gonzalez, Mancao requested that the preliminary investigation be confined to the Dacer–Corbito case and avoid other issues that may link the principal suspects to other high-profile cases.
“He has many recollections of details that may be significant in other cases but he would just discuss those if raised in the investigation,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez announced a new panel of prosecutors was created to handle the reinvestigation of the murder case.
Senior State Prosecutor Peter Ong was tapped to head the new prosecution panel. Ong was the same prosecutor who handled the investigation of the Kuratong Baleleng rubout case that implicated Lacson.
Gonzalez said Mancao appeared comfortable under NBI custody and has expressed gratitude for the security arrangements for he arrived early yesterday at Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal II via Philippine Airlines flight PR 103.
Airport officials said Mancao went through the required thermal scanning process, along with the other passengers of the airline from the US, to determine if they have symptoms of the Influenza A(H1N1) virus.
Diaz added he and Mancao, along with the rest of the NBI team that fetched the former police official from the US, would be willing to be quarantined if they tested positive for the flu virus.
“But we tested negative. We have no indications that we have flu. Before we left the United States, we also had anti-flu shots,” Diaz said. – With Sandy Araneta, Paolo Romero, Rudy Santos, Sheila Crisostomo, Ronilo Ladrino Pamonag, AP - By Edu Punay (Philstar News Service, www.philstar.com)
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Radioactivity found in City of Ottawa biosolids material
Radioactivity found in City of Ottawa biosolids material
February 23, 2009: No risk to workers, public or environment
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has completed its analysis of biosolids samples taken on February 5, 2009, from the City of Ottawa’s R.O. Pickard Environmental Centre (ROPEC).
The CNSC’s analysis indicates trace amounts of radionuclides generally used in medicine such as Iodine-131 (I-131) and Molybdenum-99/Technecium-99m (Mo-99/Tc-99m). Analysis also shows the presence of radionuclides normally found in nature such as Radium, Actinium and Thorium. In all cases, the levels found were very low. Low levels of I-131, in combination with naturally occurring radioactive material, may trigger radiation detection portal monitors, if the trigger level is set close to background levels.
The biosolids containing trace amounts of the I-131 radionuclide did not pose any risk to the health and safety of workers, the public, or the environment.
The CNSC considered it prudent to remind all licensees in Ottawa of their regulatory obligations in respect of the disposal of any nuclear substance. However, the CNSC is not expressing any concerns regarding the operations of any licensee.
The CNSC is confident that the licensed activities at Ottawa area hospitals are being carried out within the regulatory requirements and that any disposal or abandonment of nuclear substances is being carried out in accordance with the applicable regulations.
The CNSC has been working in cooperation with the City of Ottawa and will undertaken further discussions with the City to share knowledge of best practices undertaken in other Ontario municipalities that experience similar situations.
February 4, 2009: Notice
On February 3, 2009, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) was informed by the City of Ottawa that two trucks, transporting biosolids material from the City’s sewage treatment plant were turned around at the US border on January 29, 2009 because low-level radioactivity was detected. Two more truck loads with biosolids similarly tested positive for low-level radioactivity on February 3. The material has been placed in a secure location.
The City of Ottawa, whose sewage treatment plant is not licensed by the CNSC, appropriately notified the CNSC of the situation. To assist the City of Ottawa, the CNSC dispatched an inspector to the sewage treatment plant to help identify the type and source of radioactive material.
Early indications are that the detected radioactivity is iodine-131, a commonly used medical isotope. This is normally associated with waste from hospitals or persons who have undergone medical treatment.
The CNSC assures the public that this material poses no risk to the health, safety and security of Canadians as well as the environment.
The CNSC will be in contact with Ottawa hospitals to remind them of their responsibilities regarding waste disposal and licensing requirements. The CNSC will be assisting the City of Ottawa in reviewing best practices undertaken in other Ontario municipalities.
As well, the CNSC assures the public that low-level radioactivity in Ottawa’s sewage is not related to recent events at Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd’s nuclear facility in Chalk River, Ontario.
The CNSC will continue to assist and monitor this situation.
February 23, 2009: No risk to workers, public or environment
The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) has completed its analysis of biosolids samples taken on February 5, 2009, from the City of Ottawa’s R.O. Pickard Environmental Centre (ROPEC).
The CNSC’s analysis indicates trace amounts of radionuclides generally used in medicine such as Iodine-131 (I-131) and Molybdenum-99/Technecium-99m (Mo-99/Tc-99m). Analysis also shows the presence of radionuclides normally found in nature such as Radium, Actinium and Thorium. In all cases, the levels found were very low. Low levels of I-131, in combination with naturally occurring radioactive material, may trigger radiation detection portal monitors, if the trigger level is set close to background levels.
The biosolids containing trace amounts of the I-131 radionuclide did not pose any risk to the health and safety of workers, the public, or the environment.
The CNSC considered it prudent to remind all licensees in Ottawa of their regulatory obligations in respect of the disposal of any nuclear substance. However, the CNSC is not expressing any concerns regarding the operations of any licensee.
The CNSC is confident that the licensed activities at Ottawa area hospitals are being carried out within the regulatory requirements and that any disposal or abandonment of nuclear substances is being carried out in accordance with the applicable regulations.
The CNSC has been working in cooperation with the City of Ottawa and will undertaken further discussions with the City to share knowledge of best practices undertaken in other Ontario municipalities that experience similar situations.
February 4, 2009: Notice
On February 3, 2009, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) was informed by the City of Ottawa that two trucks, transporting biosolids material from the City’s sewage treatment plant were turned around at the US border on January 29, 2009 because low-level radioactivity was detected. Two more truck loads with biosolids similarly tested positive for low-level radioactivity on February 3. The material has been placed in a secure location.
The City of Ottawa, whose sewage treatment plant is not licensed by the CNSC, appropriately notified the CNSC of the situation. To assist the City of Ottawa, the CNSC dispatched an inspector to the sewage treatment plant to help identify the type and source of radioactive material.
Early indications are that the detected radioactivity is iodine-131, a commonly used medical isotope. This is normally associated with waste from hospitals or persons who have undergone medical treatment.
The CNSC assures the public that this material poses no risk to the health, safety and security of Canadians as well as the environment.
The CNSC will be in contact with Ottawa hospitals to remind them of their responsibilities regarding waste disposal and licensing requirements. The CNSC will be assisting the City of Ottawa in reviewing best practices undertaken in other Ontario municipalities.
As well, the CNSC assures the public that low-level radioactivity in Ottawa’s sewage is not related to recent events at Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd’s nuclear facility in Chalk River, Ontario.
The CNSC will continue to assist and monitor this situation.
Monday, May 18, 2009
The Pandemic Illness
General Information
Pandemic Illnesses have and will continue to shape the world’s history. A pandemic occurs when a new bacteria or virus strain emerges and spreads easily from person to person. Because the virus is new, the human immune system has no pre-existing immunity. The immune system’s inability to recognize new virus strains is why pandemics have been so devastating in our history and will continue to impact the future.
About Pandemic Illness
Pandemic illnesses are caused when a new organism appears to which humans have little or no immunity or protection. Pandemic illnesses spread easily from person-to-person and can cause serious sickness and death among those infected.
Pandemic influenza is the most common type of pandemic illness. Three influenza pandemics occurred during the 20th century and more will occur in the future. Many experts predict that influenza will cause the next pandemic, but regardless of the cause, individual and family preparedness for the next pandemic is crucial.
A long-lasting and widespread outbreak of pandemic illness may mean changes in many areas of our lives. Schools may close; public events may be cancelled; public transportation may be limited; and air flights may be cancelled. If there is widespread illness employees may not be able to work, and businesses and public services may have to close or limit hours. Even food and water supplies may be interrupted leading to temporary shortages.
It is important to plan ahead for the possibility of a pandemic. Federal, state and local governments are already taking steps to prepare for, and respond to, a pandemic illness. Community members also need to take action. This blog will help you and your family plan and prepare for a pandemic illness.
Pandemic Illnesses have and will continue to shape the world’s history. A pandemic occurs when a new bacteria or virus strain emerges and spreads easily from person to person. Because the virus is new, the human immune system has no pre-existing immunity. The immune system’s inability to recognize new virus strains is why pandemics have been so devastating in our history and will continue to impact the future.
About Pandemic Illness
Pandemic illnesses are caused when a new organism appears to which humans have little or no immunity or protection. Pandemic illnesses spread easily from person-to-person and can cause serious sickness and death among those infected.
Pandemic influenza is the most common type of pandemic illness. Three influenza pandemics occurred during the 20th century and more will occur in the future. Many experts predict that influenza will cause the next pandemic, but regardless of the cause, individual and family preparedness for the next pandemic is crucial.
A long-lasting and widespread outbreak of pandemic illness may mean changes in many areas of our lives. Schools may close; public events may be cancelled; public transportation may be limited; and air flights may be cancelled. If there is widespread illness employees may not be able to work, and businesses and public services may have to close or limit hours. Even food and water supplies may be interrupted leading to temporary shortages.
It is important to plan ahead for the possibility of a pandemic. Federal, state and local governments are already taking steps to prepare for, and respond to, a pandemic illness. Community members also need to take action. This blog will help you and your family plan and prepare for a pandemic illness.
Global Epedemic
The experts seem to all agree -- it is not a question of if, but a question of when. When will there be a severe pandemic influenza outbreak?
In response, Hays Companies has developed a product to cover loss of revenues and extra expense emanating from pandemics., other illness, contamination and workplace violence.
The recent SARS epidemic demonstrates the vulnerability of the global market. The SARS epidemic was recognized as a global threat in March 2003, after first appearing in Southern China in November 2002. According to the World Health Organization during November 2002 through July 2003, a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS, of these 774 died. By late July 2003, no new cases were reported, and WHO declared the global outbreak to be over.
The U.S. did not suffer the economic impact of SARS. However, in Canada, the economic impact was in excess of $1 billion. The tourism and hospital industry were severely impacted and Air Canada went bankrupt. Hospitals and schools were closed and 15,000 people were quarantined. SARS was mild by pandemic standards.
The last major pandemic of 1918 (Spanish Flu) took over 40 million lives compared to the typical flu season of 1 to 1.5 million. The Russian Flu (1889/90), the Asian Flu (1957/58) and Hong Kong Flu (1968/69) were mild pandemics accounting for no more deaths than a typical flu season.
What will the next pandemic bring? Estimates are that a severe pandemic would bring a 2% mortality rate (between 200,000 to 1.9 million people in the U.S. alone and between 180 and 360 million people worldwide). It would sicken 20% of the world’s population, and result in absenteeism rates in excess of 40%. It would cripple the economy and send it into a recession. The economic financial impact is estimated at between $220 and $670 billion in the U.S., and to the World GDP at between $1.25 and $2 trillion
Its seems this is the past pandemic illness... but now recently discovered pandemic illness is Swine Flu (H1N1 flu).
Flu terms defined — Seasonal flu, H1N1 flu, avian flu, and pandemic flu are not the same.
In response, Hays Companies has developed a product to cover loss of revenues and extra expense emanating from pandemics., other illness, contamination and workplace violence.
The recent SARS epidemic demonstrates the vulnerability of the global market. The SARS epidemic was recognized as a global threat in March 2003, after first appearing in Southern China in November 2002. According to the World Health Organization during November 2002 through July 2003, a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS, of these 774 died. By late July 2003, no new cases were reported, and WHO declared the global outbreak to be over.
The U.S. did not suffer the economic impact of SARS. However, in Canada, the economic impact was in excess of $1 billion. The tourism and hospital industry were severely impacted and Air Canada went bankrupt. Hospitals and schools were closed and 15,000 people were quarantined. SARS was mild by pandemic standards.
The last major pandemic of 1918 (Spanish Flu) took over 40 million lives compared to the typical flu season of 1 to 1.5 million. The Russian Flu (1889/90), the Asian Flu (1957/58) and Hong Kong Flu (1968/69) were mild pandemics accounting for no more deaths than a typical flu season.
What will the next pandemic bring? Estimates are that a severe pandemic would bring a 2% mortality rate (between 200,000 to 1.9 million people in the U.S. alone and between 180 and 360 million people worldwide). It would sicken 20% of the world’s population, and result in absenteeism rates in excess of 40%. It would cripple the economy and send it into a recession. The economic financial impact is estimated at between $220 and $670 billion in the U.S., and to the World GDP at between $1.25 and $2 trillion
Its seems this is the past pandemic illness... but now recently discovered pandemic illness is Swine Flu (H1N1 flu).
Flu terms defined — Seasonal flu, H1N1 flu, avian flu, and pandemic flu are not the same.
Swine Flu FAQS
Why is this new H1N1 virus sometimes called “swine flu”?
This virus was originally referred to as “swine flu” because laboratory testing showed that many of the genes in this new virus were very similar to influenza viruses that normally occur in pigs in North America. But further study has shown that this new virus is very different from what normally circulates in North American pigs. It has two genes from flu viruses that normally circulate in pigs in Europe and Asia and avian genes and human genes. Scientists call this a “quadruple reassortant” virus.
How many H1N1 (swine) flu viruses are there?
Like all influenza viruses, swine flu viruses change constantly. Pigs can be infected by avian influenza and human influenza viruses as well as swine influenza viruses. When influenza viruses from different species infect pigs, the viruses can reassort (i.e. swap genes) and new viruses that are a mix of swine, human and/or avian influenza viruses can emerge. Over the years, different variations of swine flu viruses have emerged. At this time, there are four main influenza type A virus subtypes that have been isolated in pigs: H1N1, H1N2, H3N2, and H3N1. However, most of the recently isolated influenza viruses from pigs have been H1N1 viruses.
How serious is H1N1 (swine) flu infection?
Like seasonal flu, H1N1 (swine) flu in humans can vary in severity from mild to severe. Between 2005 until January 2009, 12 human cases of swine flu were detected in the U.S. with no deaths occurring. However, swine flu infection can be serious. In September 1988, a previously healthy 32-year-old pregnant woman in Wisconsin was hospitalized for pneumonia after being infected with swine flu and died 8 days later. A swine flu outbreak in Fort Dix, New Jersey occurred in 1976 that caused more than 200 cases with serious illness in several people and one death.
How severe is illness associated with this new H1N1 virus?
It’s not known at this time how severe this virus will be in the general population. CDC is studying the medical histories of people who have been infected with this virus to determine whether some people may be at greater risk from infection, serious illness or hospitalization from the virus. In seasonal flu, there are certain people that are at higher risk of serious flu-related complications. This includes people 65 years and older, children younger than five years old, pregnant women, and people of any age with chronic medical conditions. It’s unknown at this time whether certain groups of people are at greater risk of serious flu-related complications from infection with this new virus. CDC also is conducting laboratory studies to see if certain people might have natural immunity to this virus, depending on their age.
Is this H1N1 (swine) flu virus contagious?
CDC has determined that this virus is contagious and is spreading from human to human. However, at this time, it not known how easily the virus spreads between people.
What are the signs and symptoms of H1N1 (swine) flu in people?
The symptoms of H1N1 (swine) flu in people are similar to the symptoms of regular human flu and include fever, cough, sore throat, body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. Some people have reported diarrhea and vomiting associated with H1N1 (swine) flu. In the past, severe illness (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and deaths have been reported with H1N1 (swine) flu infection in people. Like seasonal flu, H1N1 (swine) flu may cause a worsening of underlying chronic medical conditions.
In children emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
•Fast breathing or trouble breathing
•Bluish or gray skin color
•Not drinking enough fluids
•Severe or persistent vomiting
•Not waking up or not interacting
•Being so irritable that the child does not want to be held
•Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough
In adults, emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
•Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath
•Pain or pressure in the chest or abdomen
•Sudden dizziness
•Confusion
•Severe or persistent vomiting
•Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough
What is the difference between a vaccine and an antiviral?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vaccines are usually given to prevent infections. Influenza vaccines are made from either pieces of the killed influenza virus or weakened versions of the live virus that will not lead to disease. When vaccinated, the body’s immune system makes antibodies which will fight off infection if exposure to the virus occurs.
Antivirals are drugs that can treat people who have already been infected by a virus. They also can be used to prevent infection when given before or shortly after exposure and before illness occurs. A key difference between a vaccine and antiviral drug is that the antiviral drug will prevent infection only when administered within a certain time frame before or after exposure and is effective during the time that the drug is being taken while a vaccine can be given long before exposure to the virus and can provide protection over a long period of time.
How do you catch H1N1 (swine) flu?
Spread of H1N1 (swine) flu can occur in two ways:
•Through contact with infected pigs or environments contaminated with swine flu viruses.
•Through contact with a person with H1N1 (swine) flu. Human-to-human spread of H1N1 (swine) flu has been documented also and is thought to occur in the same way as seasonal flu. Influenza is thought to spread mainly person-to-person through coughing or sneezing of infected people.
How does this new H1N1 virus spread?
Spread of this H1N1 virus is thought to be happening in the same way that seasonal flu spreads. Flu viruses are spread mainly from person to person through coughing or sneezing by people with influenza. Sometimes people may become infected by touching something with flu viruses on it and then touching their mouth or nose.
Are there medicines to treat H1N1 (swine) flu?
Yes. CDC recommends the use of oseltamivir (brand name Tamiflu ®) or zanamivir (brand name Relenza ®) for the treatment and/or prevention of infection with these H1N1 (swine) influenza viruses. Antiviral drugs are prescription medicines (pills, liquid or an inhaler) that fight against the flu by keeping flu viruses from reproducing in your body. If you get sick, antiviral drugs can make your illness milder and make you feel better faster. They may also prevent serious flu complications. For treatment, antiviral drugs work best if started soon after getting sick (within 2 days of symptoms
How long can an infected person spread H1N1 (swine) flu to others?
People with H1N1 (swine) influenza virus infection should be considered potentially contagious as long as they are symptomatic and possible for up to 7 days following illness onset. Children, especially younger children, might potentially be contagious for longer periods.
What can I do to protect myself from getting sick?
There is no vaccine available right now to protect against H1N1 (swine) flu. There are everyday actions that can help prevent the spread of germs that cause respiratory illnesses like influenza. Take these everyday steps to protect your health:
•Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when you cough or sneeze. Throw the tissue in the trash after you use it.
•Wash your hands often with soap and water, especially after you cough or sneeze. Alcohol-based hand cleaners are also effective.
•Avoid touching your eyes, nose or mouth. Germs spread this way.
•Try to avoid close contact with sick people.
•If you get sick with influenza, CDC recommends that you stay home from work or school and limit contact with others to keep from infecting them.
How can someone with the flu infect someone else?
Infected people may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 7 or more days after becoming sick. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.
Can people catch H1N1 (swine) flu from eating pork?
No. H1N1 (swine) influenza viruses are not transmitted by food. You can not get H1N1 (swine) influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork and pork products is safe. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160°F kills the H1N1 (swine) flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses
•Do pigs carry this virus and can I catch this virus from a pig?
•At this time, there is no evidence that swine in the United States are infected with this new virus. However, there are flu viruses that commonly cause outbreaks of illness in pigs. Most of the time, these viruses do not infect people, but influenza viruses can spread back and forth between pigs and people.
•How long can influenza virus remain viable on objects (such as books and doorknobs)?
Studies have shown that influenza virus can survive on environmental surfaces and can infect a person for up to 2-8 hours after being deposited on the surface.
•What surfaces are most likely to be sources of contamination?
Germs can be spread when a person touches something that is contaminated with germs and then touches his or her eyes, nose, or mouth. Droplets from a cough or sneeze of an infected person move through the air. Germs can be spread when a person touches respiratory droplets from another person on a surface like a desk, for example, and then touches their own eyes, mouth or nose before washing their hands.
•Is there a risk from drinking water?
Tap water that has been treated by conventional disinfection processes does not likely pose a risk for transmission of influenza viruses. Current drinking water treatment regulations provide a high degree of protection from viruses. No research has been completed on the susceptibility of the novel H1N1 flu virus to conventional drinking water treatment processes. However, recent studies have demonstrated that free chlorine levels typically used in drinking water treatment are adequate to inactivate highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza. It is likely that other influenza viruses such as novel H1N1 would also be similarly inactivated by chlorination. To date, there have been no documented human cases of influenza caused by exposure to influenza-contaminated drinking water.
•Can the new H1N1 flu virus be spread through water in swimming pools, spas, water parks, interactive fountains, and other treated recreational water venues?
Influenza viruses infect the human upper respiratory tract. There has never been a documented case of influenza virus infection associated with water exposure. Recreational water that has been treated at CDC recommended disinfectant levels does not likely pose a risk for transmission of influenza viruses. No research has been completed on the susceptibility of the H1N1 influenza virus to chlorine and other disinfectants used in swimming pools, spas, water parks, interactive fountains, and other treated recreational venues. However, recent studies have demonstrated that free chlorine levels recommended by CDC (1–3 parts per million [ppm or mg/L] for pools and 2–5 ppm for spas) are adequate to disinfect avian influenza A (H5N1) virus. It is likely that other influenza viruses such as novel H1N1 virus would also be similarly disinfected by chlorine.
•Can H1N1 influenza virus be spread at recreational water venues outside of the water?
Yes, recreational water venues are no different than any other group setting. The spread of this novel H1N1 flu is thought to be happening in the same way that seasonal flu spreads. Flu viruses are spread mainly from person to person through coughing or sneezing of people with influenza. Sometimes people may become infected by touching something with flu viruses on it and then touching their mouth or nose.
Flu Virus and Food
•Can people get 2009 H1N1 flu virus by eating food products?
Influenza viruses are not known to be spread by eating food items. Influenza viruses are spread through inhalation or through touching contaminated surfaces and then touching the mouth, nose, or eyes.
•Could a sick restaurant worker transmit 2009 H1N1 flu virus to consumers in a restaurant or other food-service venue?
Transmission of the virus in a restaurant could occur through the normal routes of infection that could happen in any public or private setting—inhalation of the virus expelled by infected individuals when coughing or sneezing, and, by touching any surface that is contaminated with the virus and then touching the mouth, nose or eyes.
Influenza is not known to be spread through consumption of a food item. However, in accordance with long-standing FDA recommendations, food workers experiencing symptoms of respiratory illness should not work with exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, linens or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
In addition, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that individuals experiencing symptoms of 2009 H1N1 flu virus stay home from work (see CDC Web site http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/swineflu_you.htm).
•Should individuals or restaurants alter cooking methods to decrease the risk of 2009 H1N1 flu virus?
It is not necessary to alter cooking times or temperatures for any food products in order to reduce chances of contracting 2009 H1N1 flu virus, because eating food is not a known method of transmission of influenza viruses.
•What are the FDA’s requirements and recommendations for the food industry regarding workers who are sick?
Current Good Manufacturing Practice Requirements:
Long-standing federal regulations require that any person who is shown to have, or appears to have, an illness by which there is a reasonable possibility of food, food-contact surfaces, or food-packaging materials becoming contaminated must be excluded from any operations that may be expected to result in such contamination until the health condition is corrected. Plant management must take all reasonable measures and precautions to ensure this.
The regulations also require that food facility managers instruct personnel to report illnesses to their supervisors.
These regulations are contained in the Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packing, or Holding Human Food, in Part 110.10 of Title 21 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/21cfr110_08.html.
For Food Retailers, Restaurants and Food Service Operations:
The FDA Food Code provides model regulations for reducing risk factors known to cause foodborne illness at retail food facilities, restaurants and other food-service operations.
Most state and local authorities have adopted Food Code provisions as regulatory requirements. In addition to several other restrictions applicable to food employees experiencing certain symptoms of illness, the Food Code stipulates that employees experiencing persistent sneezing, coughing or a runny nose that causes discharges from the eyes, nose or mouth may not work with exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, linens, or unwrapped single-service or single-use articles.
Flu Virus and Animals
•Do any swine in the United States have the H1N1 flu virus that has infected humans?
There is no evidence at this time that swine in the United States are infected with this virus strain.
•Can the H1N1 virus be transferred from humans to swine or vice versa?
USDA's National Animal Disease Center in Ames, Iowa, is conducting tests to determine the transmissibility and severity of the H1N1 flu virus in pigs. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) through its surveillance, announced recently that it found the H1N1 flu virus in a swine herd in Alberta. The CFIA believes it is highly probable that the pigs were exposed to the virus from a Canadian who had recently returned from Mexico and had been exhibiting flu-like symptoms. Signs of illness were subsequently observed in the pigs. The individual has recovered and all of the pigs are recovering or have recovered. The pigs are in quarantine. USDA continues to monitor the U.S. swine herd and to date, this particular strain of H1N1 has not been found in U.S. swine.
•Can I get this new strain of virus from eating pork or pork products?
No. According to USDA scientists, H1N1 flu is not a foodborne disease, it is a respiratory disease. USDA continues to educate the public through its food safety efforts and reminds consumers that all meat and poultry products are safe to eat when properly prepared and cooked as this kills all foodborne pathogens. More information about safe food handling is at www.befoodsafe.gov.
•What steps can I take to make sure that I prepare my food properly?
USDA reminds consumers to practice safe food handling and preparation techniques for all meat and poultry. Eating properly handled and cooked meat and poultry products are safe. Information about safe food preparation and cooking is available at www.befoodsafe.gov.
•What is this flu that people are talking about in the news?
It is a new strain of flu that consists of a mixture of genetic material from swine, avian and human influenza viruses.
•Is USDA testing and monitoring to make sure swine are not infected with the virus and if so, how?
A network of Federal veterinarians, state animal health officials and private practitioners are regularly involved with monitoring U.S. swine for signs of significant disease.
To date, there have been no reports that the influenza virus currently causing illness in humans is circulating anywhere in the U.S. swine herd.
As a proactive measure, USDA is reaching out to all state animal health officials to affirm they have no signs of this virus type in their state.
USDA has put U.S. pork producers on a high alert for safety.
As part of a comprehensive safeguarding system, USDA's laboratories routinely provide diagnostic and research services in support of ongoing operational programs.
•How will the public be notified if the government finds H1N1 flu in a U.S. herd?
Delivering factual, timely information is a priority for USDA. Should there be a detection of influenza in the U.S. swine herd, those results would be shared with the public in a timely fashion. As with all potential animal health disease situations, USDA's National Veterinary Services Laboratories stand ready to provide support of disease control and eradication programs, reagents for diagnostic testing, training and laboratory certification.
•Can you get H1N1 flu from being around or touching swine?
The CDC says that the spread of H1N1 flu can occur in two ways:
Through contact with infected pigs or environments contaminated with H1N1 flu virus.
Through contact with a person with H1N1 flu. Human-to-human spread of the H1N1 flu is thought to occur in the same way as seasonal flu. Influenza is thought to spread mainly person-to-person through coughing or sneezing of infected people.
•How do we ensure that we take the appropriate measures to protect our swine?
We encourage commercial pork producers to intensify the bio-security practices they've long had in place. They should not loan equipment or vehicles to or borrow them from other farms. Swine from outside sources, such as transitional herds should not be brought back to the farm. Transitional herd is the term we use to define those herds that have some likelihood of contact with feral swine. They should permit only essential workers and vehicles to enter the farm. Swine workers should disinfect their shoes, clothes and hands. They should thoroughly clean and disinfect equipment and vehicles entering and leaving the farm and avoid visiting other livestock farms without proper cleaning and disinfection. Also, they should report sick animals immediately. The industry understands the importance of preventing spread of the virus as quickly as possible to protect the industry.
•Is there a vaccine for humans for this new strain?
The CDC should answer any questions about a vaccine. According to the CDC, there is no vaccine to protect humans from this new variant H1N1 flu. Go to www.cdc.gov for more information.
•Is my potbelly pig in danger? Can I get it from my pet?
There is no evidence at this time that the virus is in U.S. swine. Swine owners should learn the warning signs of swine influenza. Signs of swine flu in pigs can include sudden onset of fever, depression, coughing (barking), discharge from the nose or eyes, sneezing, breathing difficulties, eye redness or inflammation, and going off feed. If your pig is showing any of these signs, call your veterinarian. Buy your animals from reputable sources and ensure that you have documentation of your new pet's origin. Be sure that you get your new animals checked by a veterinarian. Keep your pigs and areas around them clean. If you have been around other animals, make sure that you clean your shoes, clothing, and other items. And don't forget to wash your hands with warm water and soap for 20 seconds before and after handling your pet.
Preventing the Flu
•What should I do to keep from getting the flu?
•What is the best way to keep from spreading the virus through coughing or sneezing?
•What is the best technique for washing my hands to avoid getting the flu?
•What kills influenza virus? What household cleaners kill the virus?
Influenza virus is destroyed by heat (167-212°F [75-100°C]). In addition, several chemical germicides, including chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, detergents (soap), iodophors (iodine-based antiseptics), and alcohols are effective against human influenza viruses if used in proper concentration for a sufficient length of time. For example, wipes or gels with alcohol in them can be used to clean hands. The gels should be rubbed into hands until they are dry.
•How should waste disposal be handled to prevent the spread of influenza virus?
To prevent the spread of influenza virus, it is recommended that tissues and other disposable items used by an infected person be thrown in the trash. Additionally, persons should wash their hands with soap and water after touching used tissues and similar waste.
•What household cleaning should be done to prevent the spread of influenza virus?
To prevent the spread of influenza virus it is important to keep surfaces (especially bedside tables, surfaces in the bathroom, kitchen counters and toys for children) clean by wiping them down with a household disinfectant according to directions on the product label.
•How should linens, eating utensils and dishes of persons infected with influenza virus be handled?
Linens, eating utensils, and dishes belonging to those who are sick do not need to be cleaned separately, but importantly these items should not be shared without washing thoroughly first.
Linens (such as bed sheets and towels) should be washed by using household laundry soap and tumbled dry on a hot setting. Individuals should avoid “hugging” laundry prior to washing it to prevent contaminating themselves. Individuals should wash their hands with soap and water or alcohol-based hand rub immediately after handling dirty laundry. Eating utensils should be washed either in a dishwasher or by hand with water and soap.
•Should I begin taking antiviral medications such as Tamiflu® if I'm planning a visit to another country known to have any type of flu?
No, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) specifically states that at this time persons traveling to countries where there are cases of avian or H1N1 (swine) influenza in birds, poultry, swine, or humans do not need to take Tamiflu ® to prevent illness. If you become ill in any way while in the country, you should seek medical advice immediately. If you plan to travel to any country that has reported cases of flu among birds, swine, or humans, you should consider scheduling an appointment with your health care provider before traveling to discuss risks for potential exposure to diseases. Only you and your health care provider can determine that risk and what the most appropriate precautions are for you.
Coping with the Flu
•What should I do if I get sick?
If you live in areas where people have been identified with new H1N1 flu and become ill with influenza-like symptoms, including fever, body aches, runny or stuffy nose, sore throat, nausea, or vomiting or diarrhea, you should stay home and avoid contact with other people, except to seek medical care. If you have severe illness or you are at high risk for flu complications, contact your health care provider or seek medical care. Your health care provider will determine whether flu testing or treatment is needed.
•What are the warning signs of serious illness? When should I seek emergency medical care?
If you become ill and experience any of the following warning signs, seek emergency medical care.
In children emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
◦Fast breathing or trouble breathing
◦Bluish or gray skin color
◦Not drinking enough fluids
◦Severe or persistent vomiting
◦Not waking up or not interacting
◦Being so irritable that the child does not want to be held
◦Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough
In adults, emergency warning signs that need urgent medical attention include:
◦Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath
◦Pain or pressure in the chest or abdomen
◦Sudden dizziness
◦Confusion
◦Severe or persistent vomiting
◦Flu-like symptoms improve but then return with fever and worse cough
Flu and the Workplace
•In light of the ADA’s requirements, how may employers ask employees about factors, including chronic medical conditions, that may cause them to miss work in the event of a pandemic?
An employer may survey its workforce to gather personal information needed for pandemic preparation if the employer asks broad questions that are not limited to disability-related inquiries. An inquiry would not be disability-related if it identified non-medical reasons for absence during a pandemic (e.g., mandatory school closures or curtailed public transportation) on an equal footing with medical reasons (e.g., chronic illnesses that weaken immunity). Below is a sample ADA-compliant survey that could be given to all employees before a pandemic.
ADA-Compliant Pre-Pandemic Employee Survey
Directions: Answer “yes” to the whole question without specifying the reason or reasons that apply to you. Simply check “yes” or “no” at the bottom.
In the event of a pandemic, would you be unable to come to work because of any of the following reasons:
If schools or day-care centers were closed, you would need to care for a child;If other services were unavailable, you would need to care for other dependents;
If public transport were sporadic or unavailable, you would be unable to travel to work, and/or;
If you or a member of your household fall into one of the categories identified by CDC as being at high risk for serious complications from the pandemic influenza virus, you would be advised by public health authorities not to come to work (e.g., pregnant women; persons with compromised immune systems due to cancer, HIV, history of organ transplant or other medical conditions; persons less than 65 years of age with underlying chronic conditions; or persons over 65).
Answer: YES __________ NO __________
•May an employer require entering employees to have a medical test post-offer to determine their exposure to the influenza virus?
Yes, in limited circumstances. The ADA permits an employer to require entering employees to undergo a medical examination after making a conditional offer of employment but before the individual starts work, if all entering employees in the same job category must undergo such an examination.
Example A: An employer in the international shipping industry implements its pandemic influenza preparedness plan when the WHO and the CDC confirm that a new influenza virus, to which people are not immune, is infecting large numbers of people in multiple countries. Because the employer gives these medical tests post-offer to all entering employees in the same job categories, the examinations are ADA-compliant.
•During a pandemic, may an employer require its employees to adopt infection control practices?
Yes. Requiring infection control practices, such as regular hand washing, coughing and sneezing etiquette, and tissue usage and disposal, does not implicate the ADA.
•May an employer require its employees to wear personal protective equipment (e.g., face masks, gloves, or gowns) designed to reduce the transmission of a pandemic virus?
Yes. An employer may require employees to wear personal protective equipment. However, where an employee with a disability needs a related reasonable accommodation under the ADA (e.g., non-latex gloves, or gowns designed for individuals who use wheelchairs), the employer should provide these absent undue hardship.
•May an employer encourage or require employees to telework (i.e., work from an alternative location such as home) as an infection control strategy?
Yes. An employer may encourage or require employees to telework as an infection-control strategy, based on timely information from public health authorities about pandemic conditions. Telework also may be a reasonable accommodation. Of course, employers must not single out employees either to telework or to continue reporting to the workplace on a basis prohibited by any of the EEO laws.
Sony`s $1 billion annual loss
TOKYO – Sony Corp. said it lost 98.9 billion yen ($1 billion) in the fiscal year through March, its first annual net loss in 14 years. It projected it would lose even more money this year amid a serious slump in consumer demand for electronics goods.
Sony, which makes Bravia flat-panel TVs and Cyber-shot digital cameras, said Thursday it is closing three plants in Japan to help turn its business around. It is also in the midst of cutting 16,000 workers.
The Japanese electronics and entertainment company said no quick recovery was in sight, projecting a 120 billion yen ($1.2 billion) loss for the fiscal year through March 2010.
Sony joins a string of other big Japanese corporations, including Toyota Motor Corp. and Hitachi Ltd., that have announced huge losses and bleak outlooks.
Also Thursday, Sanyo Electric Co. said it booked a net loss of 93.2 billion yen ($976 million) for the fiscal year, compared with a 28.7 billion yen profit the year before. It expects to turn a small profit of 7 billion yen this year.
Sanyo is being acquired by Panasonic Corp., which is also expected to announce dismal earnings Friday.
Hit by dropping sales and the strong yen, which erodes export income, Sony lost 165 billion yen in the January-March quarter, compared to a 29 billion yen profit for the same period the previous year.
Analysts say Chief Executive Howard Stringer, who earlier this year also became president, has yet to give details of a turnaround plan, including strategies and products.
Stringer, a Welsh-born American and the first foreigner to head Sony, has promoted four relatively young executives onto his managerial team. Representing the company's gaming and electronics sectors, they aim to take advantage of Sony's sprawling empire to differentiate it from a host of rivals such as South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. and Taiwan's Acer Inc., which are better at producing cheaper products.
Sony's annual sales slid 12.9 percent to 7.73 trillion yen. Sales fell in all key markets: down 20 percent in the U.S., 17 percent in Europe and 14 percent in Japan.
Its fiscal year loss was a reversal from the 369.4 billion yen profit it had a year earlier.
Still, the annual loss was smaller than the company's forecast for a 150 billion yen shortfall. The result wasn't as bad partly because TV prices held up better than expected, Sony said. A one-time gain from a change in Japanese tax laws also helped, it said.
Sony continued to lose money in its game segment, where its PlayStation 3 home console and PlayStation Portable have struggled against Nintendo Co.'s Wii and DS, as well as in some markets against the Xbox 360 from Microsoft Corp.
Koya Tabata, analyst with Credit Suisse in Tokyo, said the forecast was in line with what he had expected. Sony must in the short run fix its electronics inventory as one step in turning its business around, he said.
"In the longer term, we are all waiting for the PlayStation network business to deliver profits," he said. "But that depends on management."
Sony sold 10.06 million PlayStation 3 machines for the fiscal year through March, up 10 percent from the previous year. It also sold more PlayStation Portable machines, at 14.11 million during the fiscal year, up slightly from 13.81 million.
Sony is closing three plants in Japan by the end of December — one for cell-phone cameras, another for video recorder parts and another for systems used for smart cards. After they are shuttered, the number of plants around the world will dwindle from 57 last year to 49.
The company said it was on track with its previously announced plan to reduce 8,000 of its 185,000 jobs around the world, and trim another 8,000 temporary workers who aren't included in the global work force tally.
Sony said it was raising its cost reduction efforts from an earlier 250 billion yen by March 2010 to 300 billion yen.
It said it had an operating loss in its core electronics segment because of the slowing global economy, price competition and a strong yen, which erased any benefits from better liquid-crystal display TVs.
In its movies division, home entertainment sales declined. They were not offset by some of its stronger motion picture releases, including "Hancock."
In its music business, Beyonce's "I Am Sasha Fierce" and AC/DC's "Black Ice" were among albums that did well during the fiscal year just ended.
Sony stock dropped 6.8 percent to 2,400 yen in Tokyo. Earnings were announced after trading ended.
Transformers 2: Bumblebee(2010 Chevrolet Yellow Camaro)
Last time we saw it from afar, but now we've got the first close-up shot of what we're now told is a Corvette concept shot on the set of the new Transformers 2 movie, Revenge of the Fallen. The latest shot, posted to the Motown Muscle forum, comes with some degree of reliability given it comes with two new shots of the "Bumblebee" version of the 2010 Chevy Camaro Z28. That's right, our e-mail tipster, who also posted the shots on the forum, claims not only that this is a 2010 (or 2012) Corvette concept, but also that this isn't the "SS" Camaro, it's the Z28. Whether this mean we'd not only get a "Super Sport" package, but also a "special performance package" via a Z28 check box remains to be seen. UPDATE: We've also been told it may just be a package we can order from the folks at Saleen. But, we digress — if we're to believe the poster, both vehicles are getting some sort of paint treatment as part of work they're undergoing at the hands of Chip Foose. How the producers of the new Transformers 2 movie got Foose to step away from his work on "Foosical: The Musical" we'll never know. Hit the jump for the Camaro shots and some of our own speculation.
Car model of Bumblebee(Transformers 2: Revenge of the Fallen )
Thin And Rich
A new set of chips gives super-slim cellphones the power of laptops.
Think of Toshiba's TG01 cellphone as the world's smallest PC. It powers 3-D games, plays high-definition movies, and smoothly runs many programs at once, a combo few other phones offer. Yet it's less than four tenths of an inch thick — 20 percent thinner than an iPhone — thanks to Qualcomm's Snapdragon system, which packs several previously separate chips into one case the size of a dime.
Short Circuit: Courtesy Qualcomm
Snapdragon builds in a speedy one-gigahertz processor (about as powerful as a budget laptop's) as well as a graphics chip, a GPS receiver, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth radios, and a fast cellular data chip that can work on any network. By putting all these pieces in one package, Qualcomm can eliminate the usual bulky cover around each individual chip. The compact result won't hog your battery, either — the main processor boasts low-power transistors and runs at top speed only when needed. Even at full tilt, it sips only half a watt, far less than other processors that run at around the same speed.
The TG01 hits Europe this summer. Qualcomm says other gadget manufacturers, including Samsung and LG, will release Snapdragon phones later this year, possibly here in the U.S.
The MegaGoods Roundup
Our biggest collection yet: over 200 of the year's best gadgets, goods and gizmos
by Satoshi: SatoshiJust in time for the holidays, PopSci presents our roundup of the year's must-have products. From high-voltage flashlights and the flattest-screen TV to a waterproof camera and carbon-fiber laptop, it's the best and shiniest of 2007.
by Satoshi: SatoshiJust in time for the holidays, PopSci presents our roundup of the year's must-have products. From high-voltage flashlights and the flattest-screen TV to a waterproof camera and carbon-fiber laptop, it's the best and shiniest of 2007.
Experiments in Bluetooth Hatery
The Grouse tries on his least favorite tech
The Grouse tries on his least favorite tech
By Tom Conlon
Jawbone Prime: courtesy Jawbone
I don't like Bluetooth earpieces, and I don't like the people who wear them. Sounds kind of like a deranged T-shirt slogan, doesn't it? There's something about the tiny little headsets that's always bothered me. A few years ago, I noticed a strange phenomenon sweeping New York City: suddenly it wasn't just the crazies who were chattering to themselves on the street anymore -- business people were doing it too! And now, with the technology far less exotic and more affordable than it used to be, it seems like almost everyone is walking around talking to the little voices inside of their heads. But even with that kind of widespread acceptance, I still loathe the little buggers. Of course, this opinion of mine was formed without ever having used a Bluetooth headset in my life. Can some firsthand experience change my tune? I tested out a couple of earpieces to find out.
If you're going to test drive a Bluetooth headset, then you might as well get behind the wheel of a Porsche -- and so I got my hands on the recently released Jawbone Prime by Aliph. Read a few reviews of the original Jawbone and you'll soon arrive at the inevitable conclusion that it's, by far, the best Bluetooth headset available. The Prime improves upon the original with a slimmer form factor, redesigned buttons and a serious upgrade to the NoiseAssassin sound-canceling technology. Aliph isn't at all shy about calling it "The Best Headset Ever Created." At $130, it better be. But to be sure, I also tested it against the $40 Plantronics Explorer 230, which was the cheapest headset I could find at RadioShack (and one that the RadioShack employee repeatedly cautioned me against purchasing!). If the Jawbone is a Porsche, then I guess that would make the Plantronics a Saturn, right?
Both units connected to my phone really easily, and both were super simple to work -- press a button to pick up a call; press it again to end it. In terms of fit and comfort, it really depends on your preference. The Plantronics requires an ear loop to stay on, while the Jawbone gives you options for either a loop or for a special earbud that stays lodged in your ear without the need for a loop. The Jawbone also comes with six different earbud sizes that pretty much guarantee a proper fit on anyone. I chose to go with the loop at first, not truly convinced that the special earbud could possibly keep the Jawbone from falling into my coffee. To my surprise, I prefer the fit of the Plantronics one, which is attached to the earpiece on a swivel wheel that lets you easily position the headset for maximum comfort. The Jawbone loop is locked in one position, and that one position didn't happen to fit me very well at all. Eventually, I mustered the courage to go loopless, and once I realized the Jawbone wasn't going to fall out (unless I was unexpectedly tackled), there was no going back -- death to the loop!
Visually, the Jawbone shames the Plantronics. No joke: It's been recognized by the Museum of Modern Art. The Plantronics, on the other hand, looks like something an IT guy would use as his second stringer. You know, like that pair of comically outdated eyeglasses you keep around in case of emergency. But I found that the Jawbone's good looks get in the way of usability. The main function button is hidden underneath the designer shell, and you're meant to locate it when it's on your head by running your finger over a very subtle divot. Too subtle, if you ask me. I found myself repeatedly turning the Jawbone on and off accidentally -- sometimes during calls -- as I attempted to push the unit into my ear. The Plantronics button, while not very nice to look at, is big, circular, recessed from the surface and easy to find. I prefer it.
But design isn't what's most important. It's sound quality. And, to be honest, I didn't detect any difference at all between the two units when it came to what I was hearing on my end of the conversation. Both were equally capable of injecting my eardrum with voice that sounded crisp and clean. It's the other end of the conversation, though, where the Jawbone's $130 price tag starts to make perfect sense. The name NoiseAssassin isn't just crafty marketing slang: The technology absolutely murders background sound. To test it out, I left two voice messages for myself while sitting in front of my computer speakers with music playing at a fairly loud volume. The message left using the Plantronics headset was junk -- hopelessly inaudible. The Jawbone, on the other hand, removed the music completely, leaving only my voice. It's quite astonishing, actually (see the official demo). I also tested both headsets outdoors where sirens, car horns and wind rendered the Plantronics useless. The Jawbone worked great. In the end, this is what you're paying for. If you plan to use a headset in the silence of your office or car, then go for the Plantronics. If you plan on using it outdoors or in crowded public spaces, then there really is no choice but to spring for the noise-annihilating Jawbone.
OK, so after a week of living with a Bluetooth headset, am I ready to set aside my prejudices and embrace the Nerd Dongle? Well, there are some things I'm surprised to find I like. For one, I didn't miss any calls all week. I've always got my phone set to vibrate and as a result I'm always missing calls (why can't I adjust the vibration level like I can the volume?!). With the earpiece in, I hear an unmistakable little "bleep bloop" with every incoming call. Another thing I like is not having to fumble around in my pockets for my phone every time a call comes in -- though that's only if I'm bold enough to answer a call without first peeping the caller ID. Another advantage: being able to talk on the phone while it's charging over by the outlet. And finally, there's the whole car thing. With a ban on cell phone use while driving in New York (and many other states), I'm forced to ignore calls that come through when I'm on the road. I liked being able to answer them with the earpiece in.
Still, I'm not ready to sign up just yet. I'm not ready to become one of ... those people. I walked around with an earpiece in all week scared to death that I'd run into someone I know. Whenever I was paying for something at a store, I felt like the person behind the counter was wishing bodily harm would befall me. In fact, I noticed a lot of non-Bluetoothers looking at me with a little bit of disdain and, frankly, it made me uncomfortable. I kept wanting to throw it off and say, "No! This is just an experiment. This isn't the real me!" But after playing around with the technology for a while and seeing all of the things it's good for, I've come to the conclusion that it isn't the Bluetooth headset I loathe so much -- it's the behavior of some (not all) of the people who use them. I think we've all been in the presence of that person who rudely carries on two conversations at once: the one they're having with you or with a store clerk in person, and the one they're having with their BFF or dog groomer over the phone. I see that sort of thing and I feel sad for the future of our society. For me, the person who misuses such a good technology in this way shows a lack of respect for their fellow human beings -- as if something much bigger and more important is happening elsewhere. It also shows a lack of engagement in the living, breathing real world right in front of their eyes. After this week, I look forward to using a Bluetooth headset while driving or while working at my desk, but that's as far as I'm willing to take it. For now.
The Grouse tries on his least favorite tech
By Tom Conlon
Jawbone Prime: courtesy Jawbone
I don't like Bluetooth earpieces, and I don't like the people who wear them. Sounds kind of like a deranged T-shirt slogan, doesn't it? There's something about the tiny little headsets that's always bothered me. A few years ago, I noticed a strange phenomenon sweeping New York City: suddenly it wasn't just the crazies who were chattering to themselves on the street anymore -- business people were doing it too! And now, with the technology far less exotic and more affordable than it used to be, it seems like almost everyone is walking around talking to the little voices inside of their heads. But even with that kind of widespread acceptance, I still loathe the little buggers. Of course, this opinion of mine was formed without ever having used a Bluetooth headset in my life. Can some firsthand experience change my tune? I tested out a couple of earpieces to find out.
If you're going to test drive a Bluetooth headset, then you might as well get behind the wheel of a Porsche -- and so I got my hands on the recently released Jawbone Prime by Aliph. Read a few reviews of the original Jawbone and you'll soon arrive at the inevitable conclusion that it's, by far, the best Bluetooth headset available. The Prime improves upon the original with a slimmer form factor, redesigned buttons and a serious upgrade to the NoiseAssassin sound-canceling technology. Aliph isn't at all shy about calling it "The Best Headset Ever Created." At $130, it better be. But to be sure, I also tested it against the $40 Plantronics Explorer 230, which was the cheapest headset I could find at RadioShack (and one that the RadioShack employee repeatedly cautioned me against purchasing!). If the Jawbone is a Porsche, then I guess that would make the Plantronics a Saturn, right?
Both units connected to my phone really easily, and both were super simple to work -- press a button to pick up a call; press it again to end it. In terms of fit and comfort, it really depends on your preference. The Plantronics requires an ear loop to stay on, while the Jawbone gives you options for either a loop or for a special earbud that stays lodged in your ear without the need for a loop. The Jawbone also comes with six different earbud sizes that pretty much guarantee a proper fit on anyone. I chose to go with the loop at first, not truly convinced that the special earbud could possibly keep the Jawbone from falling into my coffee. To my surprise, I prefer the fit of the Plantronics one, which is attached to the earpiece on a swivel wheel that lets you easily position the headset for maximum comfort. The Jawbone loop is locked in one position, and that one position didn't happen to fit me very well at all. Eventually, I mustered the courage to go loopless, and once I realized the Jawbone wasn't going to fall out (unless I was unexpectedly tackled), there was no going back -- death to the loop!
Visually, the Jawbone shames the Plantronics. No joke: It's been recognized by the Museum of Modern Art. The Plantronics, on the other hand, looks like something an IT guy would use as his second stringer. You know, like that pair of comically outdated eyeglasses you keep around in case of emergency. But I found that the Jawbone's good looks get in the way of usability. The main function button is hidden underneath the designer shell, and you're meant to locate it when it's on your head by running your finger over a very subtle divot. Too subtle, if you ask me. I found myself repeatedly turning the Jawbone on and off accidentally -- sometimes during calls -- as I attempted to push the unit into my ear. The Plantronics button, while not very nice to look at, is big, circular, recessed from the surface and easy to find. I prefer it.
But design isn't what's most important. It's sound quality. And, to be honest, I didn't detect any difference at all between the two units when it came to what I was hearing on my end of the conversation. Both were equally capable of injecting my eardrum with voice that sounded crisp and clean. It's the other end of the conversation, though, where the Jawbone's $130 price tag starts to make perfect sense. The name NoiseAssassin isn't just crafty marketing slang: The technology absolutely murders background sound. To test it out, I left two voice messages for myself while sitting in front of my computer speakers with music playing at a fairly loud volume. The message left using the Plantronics headset was junk -- hopelessly inaudible. The Jawbone, on the other hand, removed the music completely, leaving only my voice. It's quite astonishing, actually (see the official demo). I also tested both headsets outdoors where sirens, car horns and wind rendered the Plantronics useless. The Jawbone worked great. In the end, this is what you're paying for. If you plan to use a headset in the silence of your office or car, then go for the Plantronics. If you plan on using it outdoors or in crowded public spaces, then there really is no choice but to spring for the noise-annihilating Jawbone.
OK, so after a week of living with a Bluetooth headset, am I ready to set aside my prejudices and embrace the Nerd Dongle? Well, there are some things I'm surprised to find I like. For one, I didn't miss any calls all week. I've always got my phone set to vibrate and as a result I'm always missing calls (why can't I adjust the vibration level like I can the volume?!). With the earpiece in, I hear an unmistakable little "bleep bloop" with every incoming call. Another thing I like is not having to fumble around in my pockets for my phone every time a call comes in -- though that's only if I'm bold enough to answer a call without first peeping the caller ID. Another advantage: being able to talk on the phone while it's charging over by the outlet. And finally, there's the whole car thing. With a ban on cell phone use while driving in New York (and many other states), I'm forced to ignore calls that come through when I'm on the road. I liked being able to answer them with the earpiece in.
Still, I'm not ready to sign up just yet. I'm not ready to become one of ... those people. I walked around with an earpiece in all week scared to death that I'd run into someone I know. Whenever I was paying for something at a store, I felt like the person behind the counter was wishing bodily harm would befall me. In fact, I noticed a lot of non-Bluetoothers looking at me with a little bit of disdain and, frankly, it made me uncomfortable. I kept wanting to throw it off and say, "No! This is just an experiment. This isn't the real me!" But after playing around with the technology for a while and seeing all of the things it's good for, I've come to the conclusion that it isn't the Bluetooth headset I loathe so much -- it's the behavior of some (not all) of the people who use them. I think we've all been in the presence of that person who rudely carries on two conversations at once: the one they're having with you or with a store clerk in person, and the one they're having with their BFF or dog groomer over the phone. I see that sort of thing and I feel sad for the future of our society. For me, the person who misuses such a good technology in this way shows a lack of respect for their fellow human beings -- as if something much bigger and more important is happening elsewhere. It also shows a lack of engagement in the living, breathing real world right in front of their eyes. After this week, I look forward to using a Bluetooth headset while driving or while working at my desk, but that's as far as I'm willing to take it. For now.
FBMA Marine in Balamban: Shipbuilder axes 40% of workforce
By Ehda M. Dago-oc Updated May 15, 2009 12:00 AM
CEBU, Philippines – FBMA Marine Inc., an Aboitiz-owned shipbuilding plant inside the West Cebu Industrial Park (WCIP) in Balamban, Cebu, announced yesterday that it is retrenching 73 regular employees since their company has not received a single order for a vessel the past six months.
Since the company is still completing two vessels for United Kingdom, that are due in July this year, it has retained 115 workers mostly from the production side.
“We’ve made a thorough assessment on this matter. We are victims of the global economic crisis. There are a lot of second hand vessels anchored around offered at a very low price,” said FBMA chairman and chief operating officer Roberto Aboitiz.
Effective June 15, the 73 regular employees of FBMA, will lose their jobs. Most of them are from support operations, such as administrative department, warehouse and purchasing.
However, Aboitiz assured that the Aboitiz Group companies, like the Tsuneishi Shipbuilding plant also in WCIP, and other companies under the conglomerate, would endorse the names of these retrenched employees for possible hiring.
The shipbuilding plant, which has been one of the prides of Cebu for producing internationally-accepted and high quality vessels for craftsmanship, is not however, announcing a full plant closure.
But it is currently looking for an investor “not just to bring money, but to bring clients.”
Aside from the separation pay and other settlements required by law for displaced workers, FBMA is also setting up different measures to help the affected employees.
“Our new business now is work for job for these people. Our business is affected externally, not internally. The world crisis now is so much, as it’s gonna last long,” Aboitiz said in a press conference yesterday to formally announce the company’s partial retrenchment program.
While there is still hope that FBMA will be able to get highly-specialized vessel orders from around the world, Aboitiz said this time, the company has to make a ‘hard decision” of cutting off 40 percent of its workforce.
“The market has dried up, there are less requirements for vessels now,” Aboitiz said.
The company has incurred losses in the last six months. According to Dough Border, FBMA chief operating officer (COO) the company had been averaging to close at least 10 to 12 vessels ship orders per year.
This time, due to widespread economic slowdown, the shipbuilding industry being severely affected, Aboitiz added.
In 2006, FBMA lost 305 workers simultaneously to an Australian-based shipbuilding company that launched an allegedly illegal mass hiring in the Philippines, particularly from the ship building companies in Balamban.
The first vessel constructed by 15-year-old FBMA was a 50-knots 45-meter Tricat for the Hong Kong-Macau route.
It has delivered 22 vessels to different countries since 1997, such as Europe, United States, Australia, and some parts of Asia.
Balamban Mayor Alex Binghay, for his part lauded FBMA’s move to work for alternative jobs for the displaced workers.
FBMA Marine is an experienced builder of steel and aluminum vessels based in Balamban, Cebu. — /NLQ (THE FREEMAN)
Pentium Prosecution
The E.U. fines Intel $1.45 billion for anti-trust violations, and for doing 3.2GHz in a 1.8GHz zone
By Stuart Fox
Intel inside : I hope the E.U. takes checks... courtesy of Uwe Hermann, via Flickr.com
Since 2001, the European Union's (EU) anti-trust regulators have investigated complaints that chip maker Intel engaged in anti-competitive practices. They accused Intel of of paying retailers not to sell computers with AMD chips, and for using its position as the number-one chip manufacturer to muscle around competition. Today, the EU handed down the decision in the form of a $1.4 billion fine, the largest in European history.
While that number is still less than the $4 billion some predicted, the fine handily beats out the previous record holder, the $1.16 billion fine handed to Microsoft.
The New York Times comes at the story from the legal angle, while Ars Technica gets deeper into the nitty-gritty of what Intel actually did.
Meanwhile, the Inquirer (the legit one, not the "National" one) takes a slightly more gossipy angle by looking at the reactions of executives at Intel's chief rival, AMD. Needless to say, the reactions were generally positive, ranging from mild schadenfreude to "PWNED!" The Register investigates the ramifications of the suit, noting that it may spark a run of civil suits against the reeling chip giant.
Looking into the future, Agence France-Presse speculates that the EU may try to take down Google next. Ironically, the investigation into Google is evidently being egged on by none other than the original computer anti-trust bad boys, Microsoft.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
